| Page 1 of 1 |
[ 5 posts ] |
Invisibillity Cloak + Space Travel
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Spaceflight Enthusiast ![]()
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:05 am
Posts: 2 |
I was eating my breakfast today and thinking about how cool would be having an invisibillity cloak. While projecting the image of the technology(http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~ulf/invmagicmaxwell0.gif) in my head i quickly switched to the image of Earth's magnetic field. Thinking "man, would be needed a powerfull magnetic field for that. kinda hard to do it..." but then it hit me... Invisibillity --- Solar wind...
Can we make an invisibillity cloak that works in the range of the dangerous solar radiation? Or am i missing something? Im not any scientist and dont realy understand alot about all this stuff. maybe what im saying is nonsence but i was bored so posted here |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moderator ![]()
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 4:01 am
Posts: 750 Location: New Zealand |
You mean as a radiation shield?
_________________ What goes up better doggone well stay up! - Morgan Gravitronics, Company Slogan. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moderator ![]()
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:23 am
Posts: 3745 Location: Hamburg, Germany |
The following I already posted in the Spaceflight Cafe but wanted it here because the subject is serious technology. I copied it simply because of its "fun"-aspect for the Cafe.
There are one article under www.wissenschaft.de and www.welt.de each telling that in between cloaking at read visible light is possible. Materials with a negative index of refraction are applied. These materials are now capable of directing light around three-dimensional bodies - formerly this was limited to two-dimensonal. The breakthrough was achieved by a tiny net of 21 layers of Silver an Magnesium-Difluorine and by another team via a wood of nano-wires made of Silver embedded into a construction of aluminum. www.wissenschaft.de is referring to Xiang Zhang (University of California, Berkeley) et al.: Nature, Online-Prepublishment, DOI: 10.1038/nature07247 andScience, Vol. 321, page 930 ( www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncur ... 07247.html , www.sciencemag.org/ ) Dipl.-Volkswirt (bdvb) Augustin (Political Economist) |
| Back to top |
|
|
Moderator ![]()
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 4:01 am
Posts: 750 Location: New Zealand |
Well you would have to figure out how to not keep losing the thing in the lab.
However while it may bend low energy photons I suspect you will need a much more powerful, much larger magnetic field to deflect High energy radiation. _________________ What goes up better doggone well stay up! - Morgan Gravitronics, Company Slogan. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Commander ![]()
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 9:22 pm
Posts: 858 Location: New York, NY |
i would be concerned in that most of the stuff you want to deflect generally isn't photons, a lot of the dangerous solar wind stuff is charged particles. you will need a magnetic shield to deflect these no matter the presence of an invisibility cloak or not (well, maybe not but their deBroglie wavelengths are much smaller than even very high energy photons, so it would be very difficult). that being said, it would be really cool to natively bend x-rays or similar cosmic radiation out of your way...
_________________ Cornell 2010- Applied and Engineering Physics Software Developer Also, check out my fractals |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 5 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Psiberzerker and 25 guests |



Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.