| Page 1 of 1 |
[ 5 posts ] |
Space Catapult
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Spaceflight Enthusiast ![]()
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:48 pm
Posts: 1 |
The space elevator can’t be built today, because there is no material to produce a lift cable with the required strength and length (“unobtainium”), and no one knows if and when it will come. Since 1991 they try to produce longer CNT (carbon nano tubes), but they are still only some mm long instead of 100 000km needed for the spacel. And how to drive the cable cars is only known in principle (with giant lasers) but not in practice.
But luckily there is an alternative that doesn’t need any unknown material or immature techniques. A simple calculation shows, that to attain v1 = 7.9 km/s (the first cosmic velocity) necessary for low earth orbits (LEO) with an acceleration of 3g (which was the maximum acceleration of the space shuttle) you have to cover a distance of ca. 1100 km in ca. 4.5 min like rockets going to a LEO do. But to save the enormous costs of the rockets the acceleration should be done on earth. So you build a railroad of that length, preferably a maglev guideway. The maglev technique is well known and used e.g. with the German ‘Transrapid’ in Shanghai. To prevent energy loss and dangerous heating of the rail cars you have to put it in a vacuum tube. At the end this tube must softly go up, so that the muzzle is well above the atmosphere, about 25 km high. The supporting structure can be made of carbon fiber which has a breaking length of 250 km (WIKIPEDIA: Specific strength). This project was developed and is promoted under the name ‘StarTram’ (see WIKI or google) but with the difference that the tube is held up by magnetic fields instead of a material framework. You may also look at google: ‘future universe: space catapult’. Please help to end the space elevator delusion, so that the space cat gets its chance! |
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Station Member ![]()
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:40 am
Posts: 341 Location: California and Michigan |
Look Up Zeropto on goole+
_________________ Let not the bindings of society hold you back from improving it.... the masses follow where the bold explore. |
| Back to top |
|
|
Spaceflight Participant ![]()
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:01 pm
Posts: 74 |
I vote for option c.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Space Walker ![]()
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 4:32 am
Posts: 153 Location: Melbourne, Australia |
lightningbob wrote: I vote for option c. Is option c a plasma balloon/electric propulsion system? _________________ "SCREW THE RULES, WE HAVE MONEY!" http://www.freespaceships.com |
| Back to top |
|
|
Spaceflight Participant ![]()
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:01 pm
Posts: 74 |
Hex yeah!
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 5 posts ] |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: JamesG and 27 guests |




Gabitasoft Interactive. All Rights Reserved.